17th of September, 2008
It can be proven that this is the only solution using an argument similar to that found in Griffiths’ book (page 118, second uniqueness theorem), but using the displacement vector instead of .
If the sphere is pushed “deeper” into the dielectric (fig. 2a), the potential cannot stay unchanged because the electric field will no longer be parallel to the surface of the dielectric and bound charges will be induced. In the case illustrated on fig. 2b, the potential will not change.
If the total charge of the sphere is constant, the charges will redistribute on the surface of the sphere in such a way that the electric field can stay spherically symmetric. On the lower hemisphere the bound charges will reduce the total (bound + free) surface charge density by a factor of . Thus, if the total free charge is , and the total charge is , . The potential will be reduced by a factor of everywhere in space.
The polarization of the dielectric is where is the susceptibility of the material. We shall need to consider regions with uniform polarization .
What is the electric field inside a uniformly polarized sphere, of polarization ?
|
A uniformly polarized sphere can be imagined as two superposed uniformly but oppositely charged spheres, slightly displaced by . The electric field inside a uniformly charged sphere with charge density , at position relative to the sphere’s centre is
The electric field inside the superposed spheres is
The polarization vector can be thought of as a density of electric dipole moments, so , and the electric field inside the polarized region is
The electric field in a spherical cavity is
Thus the electric field in the middle of a needle of length is
The electric field in a cavity is
Thus the electric field in a thin wafer shaped cavity is
The dipole moment of a sphere of volume and polarization is , so the polarizability of a sphere is .
Let us assume that that all the droplets have volume and there are droplets per unit volume: .
By definition, if is the susceptibility of the emulsion, its polarization, and the electric field inside, then . If the density of the droplets is low (), we can consider the field polarizing a droplet to be , so and . In this case and
However, is the average field in the emulsion, and a precise treatment of the problem must consider the local field polarizing a droplet (see problem 4.38 in Griffiths). Because of the distorting effect of the neighbouring droplets, this local field will be different from the average field. To approximate this local field, imagine that we remove the droplet, creating a spherical cavity in the emulsion. The electric field in this cavity will be
Using this formula,
and
![]() |
The motion of the particle is governed by the equation
Let us take the average of both sides of this equation over a complete cycle:
Thus,
For calculating , we again approximate the actual trajectory with the non-perturbed one:
Integrating these expressions over we get . Defining , the drift velocity is
where .